Sayings. My mother loved sayings. She got most of them from her mother, who loved sayings too. âWho knows what itâs good forâ was one of her favorites. When I was younger I didnât understand most of them. Now that Iâm older, Iâm slowly but surely turning into an idiom connoisseur, just like my grandmother used to be.
âWho knows what itâs good for.â
I understand it now. I know what it means, or at least I believe that I do. It encapsulates the story of the Chinese farmer,1 that Alan Watts loved to tell. He told it many times, but in the one recording I just listened to it goes like this:
Once upon a time there was a Chinese farmer who lost a horse.
Ran away.And all the neighbors came around that evening and said:
âThatâs too bad.âAnd he said: âMaybe.â
The next day the horse came back and brought seven wild horses with it.
And all the neighbors came around and said:
âWhy, thatâs great! Isnât it?âAnd he said: âMaybe.â
The next day his son was attempting to tame one of these horses and was riding it and was thrown, and broke his leg.
And all the neighbors came round in the evening and said:
âWell, thatâs too bad, isnât itâŚâAnd the farmer said: âMaybe.â
The next day the conscription officers came around looking for people for the army, and they rejected his son because he had a broken leg.
And all the neighbors came round that evening and said:
âIsnât that wonderful!âAnd he said: âMaybe.â
After the laughter subsides, Alan goes on to distill the essence of the story:
The whole process of nature is an integrated process of immense complexity, and itâs really impossible to tell whether anything that happens in it is good or badâbecause you never know what will be the consequence of the misfortune; or, you never know what will be the consequences of good fortune.
You never know. Thatâs the essence.
You never know what itâs good for.
I picked up a book at the train station today. I picked it up because it had oranges on the cover, and orange things stand out to me. Itâs a good book. A small book. A book about insights. Those little moments where something *clicks* in your head. Those little moments where you go âa-haaaâ or âoooohâ and the world is suddenly different in one way or another, large or small.
One of the âa-haâ moments described in the book is that you might think that whatever youâre caught up with is very important right nowâwhether it be work, sport, a hobby, a project, a tournament, whateverâbut then you get a call from the hospital that something terrible happened to a friend, or one of your loved ones is seriously ill. And suddenly the world is different, and the things that were terribly important a minute ago are not anymore.
Thereâs a saying that goes something like this: âWe donât perceive things as they are, we perceive them as we are.â I like that one. It is deeply (and in hindsight: obviously) true, but Iâm pretty sure Iâve dismissed it the first time Iâve heard it (or the first time Iâve read it).
Before I was whatever I am now, I was a skateboarder. If you wouldâve shown me a picture of some stairs with a handrail to hold on to, all I would see is something to slide or grind down on. My perception of the cityâany cityâwas very different from what a regular person might perceive. All I saw was ledges, drops, ramps, quarters, and wheelie tables. Later I got into photography, and my perception of the world changed again. And later still the worldâmy worldâstarted to turn orange, and my perspective (and thus perception) changed again.
Many âa-haâ moments.
Many ways to view the world.
I had another one of these âa-haâ moments a couple days ago. Maybe a week ago or so; but most definitely before I heard the news about my mother. I was reading another book that I really like. Living Buddha, Living Christ by Thich Nhat Hanh. I came to a passage on the Last Supper, containing information that Iâve known about since I was a child. I mustâve heard the following hundreds, maybe even thousands of times:
So when Jesus broke the bread and poured the wine, he said, This is My body. This is My blood. Drink it, eat it, and you will have life eternal.
It never did anything for me. But on this day, for whatever reason, I had the sudden insight that itâs literally true. And to add insult to injury, I have agreed with and chuckled at a similar sayingâsimilar in spiritâmany, many years ago. âYou are last weekâs potatoes,â which is something Richard Feynman used to say.2
You might object to or even take offense at my crude comparison. My intention is not to equate Christ to Feynman, a move that would probably trigger religious folk and science nerds alike. My intention is to lead into another age-old saying; two, even: âWhen the student is ready the teacher will appear,â and the one that goes something like âonly those who have ears to hear it will hear it, and only those who have eyes to see will see it.â I probably butchered that. And I just remembered that itâs a Bible verse. Apologies.3
Here is what I wrote down in my notebook when I had the body / blood / last weekâs potatoes âa-haâ moment: âWords are like keys; ears are like locks. Both morph and change over time, and if youâre lucky, one day youâll hear a word or a phrase and it will hit just right. It will resonate. You will understand.â
Feynman wasnât religious. He was allergic to authority; skeptical about top-down truths.4 He got it from his father, just like my mom got her one-liners from hers. I share Feynmanâs skepticism, as well as his dislike for authority. I wouldnât call myself religious either. That said, I stopped labeling myself as an âatheistâ a couple of years ago.
Too many strange things have happened to me. Things that I canât explainâor more accurately: things that I canât explain away. Things that I canât put into words, no matter how hard I try. âIneffable,â as Vervaeke would call it.
The Tao that can be spoken of is not the eternal Tao.
Lao Tzu
âŚthe eternal Tao.
Life eternal.
The fact that there are things that canât be spoken of should give us pause. The words we use might shape our reality, but they are not equal to reality. They are one step removed from reality, which in turn means that the âartificial intelligenceâ that everyone and their dog are talking about these days is twice removed from reality.
Clouds of words are molded into statistical patterns, and these statistical patterns are supposed to tell us whether itâs going to rain or not. But will it? And will it teach us anything about the nature of rain? âExplain the nature of reality. Make no mistakes.â
David Foster Wallace had a way with words, and he wrote about this disconnect beautifully: âHow odd I can have all this inside me and to you itâs just words.â
To you itâs just words.
âWho knows what itâs good for.â
To youâto most peopleâitâs just words.
To me it is everything.
Just one of these sayings.
The cover image of this post is a still from the video I linked to, and if the video description is to be believed the illustration/animation was originally made by Steve Agnos. I hope that you donât mind if I borrow those pixels, Steve. And I hope youâre well, whatever good or bad fortune you might have encountered in the 12 years since you made this video. ↩
âFor instance, the scientific article may say, âThe radioactive phosphorus content of the cerebrum of the rat decreases to one-half in a period of two weeks.â Now what does that mean? It means that phosphorus that is in the brain of a ratâand also in mine, and yoursâis not the same phosphorus as it was two weeks ago. It means the atoms that are in the brain are being replaced: the ones that were there before have gone away. So what is this mind of ours: what are these atoms with consciousness? Last weekâs potatoes! They now can remember what was going on in my mind a year agoâa mind which has long ago been replaced. To note that the thing I call my individuality is only a pattern or dance, that is what it means when one discovers how long it takes for the atoms of the brain to be replaced by other atoms. The atoms come into my brain, dance a dance, and then go outâthere are always new atoms, but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday.â âRichard Feynman, What Do You Care What Other People Think? ↩
Itâs Matthew 13:9-17, if the internet is to be believed. Very close to my favorite verse, Matthew 21:12. Twentyone twelve. ↩
He shared his views on religion in the BBC interview he did in 1983, mentioning his father multiple times in the same interview. The full interview is available on Vimeo as well as on archive.org. ↩
đ
Found this valuable? Don't have sats to spare? Consider sharing it, translating it, or remixing it.Confused? Learn more about the V4V concept.
